Talk:Single-cell analysis

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Humanpersonfromhere2.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:35, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 March 2020 and 29 April 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mullneree, Asgnia.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:35, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

not all people accept the single celled origin of life
not all people accept the single celled origin of life, and they claim that it looks like that because 1. things got well mixed, 2. all genetically original organisms weren't that complex and also died, some of their descendants survived but now are mixed in all of life, 3. in the lab many proteins and many chiralities look functional but in reality fewer fundamental mechanisms consume less energy in order to produce them etc. some quantum mechanical properties prefer one chirality etc., 4. or chirality biases were prevalent in a previous stage of life were the whole sea was acting as a single chemical bio-evolution soup cell, then various cells evolved - not a single first one, most died out witout leaving offspring, and all others eevolved mixing their tiny genome - the original cells don't exist, and their initial code was so small to produce a statistically significant result. (I don't claim that this theory is correct but we should reveal all theories, I know this isn't the correct page, but I'm in the lab and in a hurry) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:587:410D:7800:A54E:6F32:59F7:49A1 (talk) 23:57, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Review of article copyedits and references
Hello, I have noticed the sentence "Technologies such as fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) allow the precise isolation of selected single cells from complex samples, while high throughput single cell partitioning technologies," has references [4],[5] provided for the sentence. The references did not have any evidence of (FACS). I've added a source that contains information on that regard. I've also fixed a few minor grammatical errors. I am a new user to Wikipedia, I look forward to working on this Article with fellow Wikipedians. Please inform me of any feedback that you may have. Asgnia (talk) 18:45, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Major Article Update
I plan to make a significant change to this article, please take a look at what I propose to add/change in this article in my sandbox (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Humanpersonfromhere2/sandbox). I would appreciate any feedback on my proposed change. I plan to move my drafted article to the actual page within the next few days if there are no objections.Humanpersonfromhere2 (talk) 02:34, 17 April 2017 (UTC)