Talk:Sino-Arab relations

Chinese people of arab descent
Article on chinese descendants of an arab who came to china hundreds of years ago

http://big5.cctv.com/geography/20041013/101708.shtml

Tseeboor (talk) 03:56, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

CHAU JU-KUA: His Work on the Chinese and Arab Trade in the twelfth and thirteenth Centuries
http://library.uoregon.edu/ec/e-asia/reada/chau-ju-kua.pdf

Rajmaan (talk) 01:57, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Requested move 21 March 2015

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: NO CONSENSUS. Hadal (talk) 00:56, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

– Virtually all bilateral/multilateral relations articles follow this format. --Relisted. &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 21:17, 29 March 2015 (UTC) Charles Essie (talk) 02:28, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Sino-Arab relations → Arab League–China relations
 * Arab–Eritrean relations → Arab League–Eritrea relations
 * Arab–Pakistan relations → Arab League–Pakistan relations
 * Arab–American relations → Arab League–United States relations
 * Support as per other articles similarly categorised. GregKaye 11:49, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - Charles Essie would this not limit the scope of the article to just relations between the Arab league and China, considering the historical background in relations between the Arabs and the Chinese. Also what about Chinese relations between individual Arab states? I would support a move to Arab-Sino relations in keeping with the other already existing names. Mbcap (talk) 02:42, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Support all, but strong support the first, Support a move away from "Sino", regardless of "Arab", and otherwise just support Arab-Eritrean. Red Slash 04:33, 30 March 2015 (UTC)  Red Slash 20:59, 30 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Strong oppose for Sino-Arab relations; look at the article! Basically nothing is about the relations of the Arab League, and instead it's about "Arabs" in general in eras long before the Arab League existed.  Oppose for Arab-American relations; there's a single reference in the lede, but the majority of the article is on "Arabs" (well, disconnected incidents involving it) and not the "Arab League."  Weak oppose for Arab–Pakistan relations, that seems like a confused article, but it seems like it more wants to be about the relations with various individual Arab states, not the Arab League itself.  Support for Arab–Eritrean relations, the sole article of which seems to focus on relations with the Arab League.  Anyway, "Arab League" is not a synonym for "Arabs" any more than "United Nations" is a synonym for "Humans" or "OAS" is a synonym for "Latin Americans." SnowFire (talk) 19:17, 30 March 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Sino-Russian relations since 1991 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 15:00, 28 April 2018 (UTC)