Talk:Sinocoelurus

destub
I destubbed this because, even though it was on the short side, there's really nothing informative that could be added to this short of going through the Paleobiology Database and adding a ref for every review that considered it to be a coelurid before 1985 or so. Any thoughts? J. Spencer 04:21, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, this isn't all that short. I think de-stubbing was just fine. I've seen articles that were much shorter have their stub tags removed. As it is now, this article is 3.45 kb. So, no objection from me. Thanks for expanding this article! :) Firsfron of Ronchester  04:24, 12 January 2007 (UTC)