Talk:Sins of My Father (song)

Background info
So today I removed a bulk of background information from 2009 that had nothing to do with this song (2012). This was later reverted with the rationale: "it tells the diffence between the two albums". IMO I don't see why so much background information is necessary. So can we have some sort of discussion on this as to whether it's all necessary. Till 11:00, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
 * "In an 2009 interview with People Magazine, Usher, whose private life has been highly documented after filing for divorce from wife Tameka Foster, told that his sixth studio album will be, "racy, risky and edgy, and sometimes about personal experiences."" is the only thing that I could see to be removed. The rest is relevant. Well, and "At the 53rd Grammy Awards, held at the Staples Center in Los Angeles on February 13, 2011, the album won the accolades for Best Contemporary R&B Album and Best Male R&B Vocal Performance." Statυs ( talk ) 11:06, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Why he's still Looking 4 Himself Statυs ( talk ) 11:08, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Okay Till, I don't know how much you are familiar with Usher's life and career, but he divorced his wife in 2009 and release 2 consecutive albums where he explained the aftermath; the single life (I bet he is not so single as he says however...) after a load years of marriage. So that's the reason I put that relevant information in the background cause in fact it really bothers both Looking 4 Myself and the song. The song actually is for Tameka Foster. — Tomica   (talk)  11:11, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
 * "Upon its release, Raymond v. Raymond received generally mixed reviews from music critics, who were ambivalent towards its songwriting and themes.[3][4] However, the album was commercial success and peaked at number one on the US Billboard 200 chart, with sales of 329,000 for its first week; it became Usher's third consecutive US number one album.[5] Raymond v. Raymond spawned five singles including the international hits—"OMG" and "More"." — How is this relevant to the article in question? This is information from 2009, we are now in 2012. What needs to be said can be done on the relevant article, not on a track from a completely different album. Till 11:12, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Also, now that we are here—shouldn't "stuff" be staff? Till 11:16, 7 August 2012 (UTC)