Talk:Siobhán Coady

Redirect and content removed
Why was this article stripped of content and redirected (redirect from an article without content virtually same as deletion) when it had already passed the muster on another AfD on Dec 14, 2005 (see AfD above)? The article was subsequently noted as keep per discussion here Articles for deletion/Siobhán Coady! --HJKeats (talk) 15:26, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Continuous addition of unsourced information, and policy violations
I don't know if editors have a hard time properly understanding wikipedia policy or just think that it's a source for promoting someone they work with, but the nonsense has to stop. It has been explained many times that adding large amounts of unsourced info, most of which is so irrelevant to wikipedia that it doesn't belong to begin with, is not how to properly edit articles. Also, continuing to change section titles to all capitals is violating WP:Headings, and is starting to look more like unconstructive behaviour than a good faith edit by an editor who doesn't know the policy. Once or twice is ok, but over and over again is getting to be a bit much. If you're going to add relevant info to the article, than go ahead and do it, just properly source the edits, but if you're only going to add info taking about what a great person the subject is, and what a great job she is doing, than it's only going to be reverted, because your point-of-view doesn't belong in wikipedia articles. Why is it so hard to understand why statements like "What’s most impressive about Coady is how seriously she takes the business of Parliament and her job as a Parliamentarian. She is tough without being hysterical, forceful without being blustery." are not the type of statements you add to articles? Cmr08 (talk) 02:31, 27 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Just to reinforce that for User:Clownheadisnotthename (now blocked and editing from an IP address) - you will not succeed in turning this article into a sycophantic fan-page, with your ridiculous idea of what constitutes references. People have this article on their watchlists and we will revert your changes, and if you persist then the only thing you will achieve is to get the article protected. (I'm adding this here as you keep changing IP address). -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 21:58, 10 January 2011 (UTC)