Talk:Sipuncula

untitled
Added photo, removed tag.--Abbott75 08:14, 1 April 2007 (UTC) hola bola de putos —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.60.171.17 (talk) 15:37, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Phylum status
According to the Annelid article, Sipuncula are a subdivision of that phylum. Is there any reason why we treat them as an independent one in this article? Complainer (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 09:42, 20 July 2011 (UTC).
 * I don't know. Perhaps I should be bold and change the taxonomy template. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 15:48, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

"Good article"
It may not be up to this particular article to explain the earlier uses of the same name by Lhuyd and others, but it should at least explain why it lists the first use as 1767 while providing a source dated to 1766. — Llywelyn II   01:56, 16 December 2023 (UTC)