Talk:Siruvani River

Untitled
Delete

Not really notable.

If you want it to stay add more information!

WILLROCKS10 (talk) 19:18, 2 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep

Hi,

This article is perfectly acceptable to be on Wikipedia. Look how much information I've found on it after a quick 10 minute search. There's loads of information to be found on it yet. Give it a chance-After all it's a new page. That's what I always it. Some people can't be bothered to find information on pages that could be good. Just give it a chance!

Thanks, pbl1998--Pbl1998 (talk) 18:10, 3 February 2011 (UTC)


 * If you seriously want to propose an article for deletion, the talk page is not the place to do it - use a speedy deletion template if appropriate, or prod if not, but on the article page in both cases. But places, rivers, etc are generally considered notable if they verifiably exist. Better to spend energy on improving the article, rather than proposing deletion. PamD (talk) 12:33, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Talk
Hi,

I am going to revert the edits as they are irrelavent. The template you placed on the page is not needed as the page is divided into good sections already. Secondly, the 'or maybe vice-versa' is perfectly fine. As we do not know whether or not the river is named after the village, or the other way around, we need to keep it.

Thanks, --Pbl1998 (talk) 12:03, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

"Or maybe vice- versa" is not good english. We do not need to keep this bad english on the page - Willrocks10  Speak to me  12:05, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

On the contrary, I think it is (or maybe it is bad Latin?)!!!!! Isee no reason why you need to interfere with this article.

--Pbl1998 (talk) 12:07, 27 September 2012 (UTC)