Talk:Sisimiut/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: ·Maunus· ƛ · 21:48, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

I will be reviewing this article over the next week or so. I have had a breif look and am very optimistic - it doesn't look like it has any major problems.·Maunus· ƛ · 21:48, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Review
1.Well-written:
 * a.the prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct; ✅


 * b. it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. ✅

2.Factually accurate and verifiable:
 * a. it provides references to all sources of information in the section(s) dedicated to the attribution of these sources according to the guide to layout; ✅


 * b. it provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged ✅


 * c.it contains no original research. ✅

3. Broad in its coverage:
 * a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic ✅
 * b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). ✅

4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias. ✅ 5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.✅ 6. Illustrated, if possible, by images ✅
 * a. images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; ✅
 * b. images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.✅

Comment: I congratulate the editors who wrote this article - it is obviously the result of a very good team work. I can see no serious problems at all and the only thing I need to check before passing the article is the copyright status of the images. This looks very good.·Maunus· ƛ · 00:23, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I've checked image copyright and didn't detect any problems. I'll pass the article.·Maunus· ƛ · 21:37, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Thankyou Maunus. I only hope Algkalv will return soon so we collaborate on some more articles.♦ Dr. Blofeld  10:40, 26 September 2010 (UTC)