Talk:Sistan and Baluchestan insurgency

Alleged supporters
It is fine to discuss support allegations within the article, but putting alleged parties in the infobox is against Wikipedia policies - see WP:EXCEPTIONAL and WP:VERIFY.GreyShark (dibra) 05:47, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
 * I think we had the discussion somewhere else before and you just skipped it. It is very intresting that you let Qatar be in the infobox and still believe that the other countries are WP:EXCEPTIONAL and WP:VERIFY. Why? For the same reason that you remove Israel and let Iran be in the infobox? Pahlevun (talk) 13:58, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Are you kidding me - removing Iran? maybe also removing Jundallah? Those are the belligerents...
 * Now let's be serious - i removed all "alleged" parties, because we do not put "alleged" in infoboxes. End of story. Qatar might be removed as well, unless we have some solid sources on its involvement and some official statement by Qataris would help.GreyShark (dibra) 16:40, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
 * End of story? Looks like you did hesitate to click on the links. Click and you will get my point. Pahlevun (talk) 17:13, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
 * I've just inspected the only source which hadn't said "alleged" and even that Mashregh News appears to be a really low quality web tabloid. Which sources do you consider reliable enough to support claims on all the stated parties - Sweden, Israel, US, Saudi Arabia etc.?GreyShark (dibra) 13:42, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Saravan
Please note that the uprising of the people of Saravan has nothing to do with separatist insurgencies.Amir Ghandi (talk) 23:20, 26 February 2021 (UTC)