Talk:Sistotrema brinkmannii

Many of your points are very interesting! However, some points don't seem to be organized into their proper section? For example, your second point in the history and taxonomy section seems to fit better into growth and morphology. I would recommend looking at all your points without the headings, and then organizing them into the sections you think work best!

In addition, there are many points in physiology that seem to fit better into growth and morphology. One way I like to distinguish the physiology section from the growth and morphology is determining whether a function is involved. If the point talks about the function of the fungus or one of its products, then I would list it into physiology. However, if the point only talks about the life stages and what it looks like (does not talk about any functions) I would put it into growth and morphology.

You've linked a lot of the important key words (it was very helpful while reading)! Could I suggest you link the word "trama" as well?

I believe you need units for the last two points in history and taxonomy. 10-20 x 5-8 of what? (mm, nm, cm, etc)

For the habitat and reproduction section, it may be clearer if you explain the points a little further? What do the sexual and asexual forms have to do with inbreeding and outbreeding? How does morphological form change the means of reproduction?

Hope this helps!

Annissaho (talk) 03:58, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Suggestions
Here are a few more interesting references on the occurrence of your fungus.,,,,, Medmyco (talk) 20:16, 12 November 2019 (UTC)