Talk:Sita Ramachandraswamy Temple, Bhadrachalam

Misinformation, mythistory, pseudo-history
This article suffers by presenting myth / propaganda / gossip / legends as history. This is unencyclopedic and misinforms. If and where included, we must attribute it to the source, never use wikipedia voice. The article's quality also suffers by relying on questionable sources which are not WP:HISTRS. We should not mirror or summarize local Indian tabloids/blogs/newspapers for real history of this temple, given their poor record of fact checking, presenting mythology as history, paid news, propaganda and such issues. I have cleaned up this article a bit. A lot more clean up would be helpful. Please expand the section on the "temple" – the subject of this article, the architecture, the material of construction, the art, the inscriptions, etc. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 00:09, 28 July 2021 (UTC)


 * The claimed links to the Puranas and Mahatmya are all strange. Show me one scholarly source to back it up, or cite the particular chapter of any published or verifiable Telugu or Sanskrit manuscript that mentions this temple. I am leaving it in for now per AGF. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 00:25, 28 July 2021 (UTC)