Talk:Six Assurances

Dead Link
This link no longer toes to a useful page: If anyone knows where it came from or how to find it again, that would be very useful. Readin (talk) 13:14, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
 * State Department’s Official Statement in 2004
 * Fixed. There's a place called Google on the Internets. http://merln.ndu.edu/archivepdf/china/State/38081.pdf TheAsianGURU (talk) 23:17, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I had placed the same link below. I didn't realize it had the same information as the dead link originally had.  So I've deleted the duplicate.  No need to be snarky about pointing out Google when I had found the same link that way and placed it in the same section. Readin (talk) 23:51, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Text of the assurances
I'm not sure where the text given in the article comes from, but it appears to match exactly the text from the TaiwanDC page I've added to the external links. TaiwanDC is openly partisan in favor of freedom for Taiwanese people. The text from the more neutral Heritage Foundation would probably be more reliable. If no one objects, I'll change to that text. Readin (talk) 13:19, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
 * See above. TheAsianGURU (talk) 23:17, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The link you provide above doesn't have the text. Readin (talk) 23:52, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I would NEVER call anything coming out of the Heritage Foundation as "neutral." In this case, you can call the list they have as - "reliable & accurate." The foundation itself? Plz~ TheAsianGURU (talk) 23:38, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * In the context of this particular topic, I called the Heritage Foundation "more neutral" than TaiwanDC. Readin (talk) 14:11, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

The version in wiki is the content of the resolution introduced into the House in 2015, the version passed in May 2016 is different, see  --Fongyun (talk) 07:19, 19 May 2016 (UTC)