Talk:SixtyEight Research

The references in this article seem ridiculous. The single AppleInsider article can be used as the citation for 90% of the article's claims. I'd almost argue this is eligible for deletion under WP:COMPANY, as the majority of the cited articles that actually mention SixtyEight are rehashings of the AppleInsider article. 2620:0:1000:447C:9029:2750:564D:E322 (talk) 20:43, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not the place for this article
This article is mostly gossip. The only three useful non-gossip-related facts you can get on this company is its name and vauge details on when it was founded and where its headquarters are. There is a place for this, but Wikipedia isn't it. --Proud User (talk) 22:37, 5 August 2015 (UTC)