Talk:Sixty Million Dollar Man

Infobox Tag
Infobox tag has been removed as article already has one. If you have any problems with this please post a message on my talk page. RWardy 08:31, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Plot section needs fixing
The plot section for this movie is overly long and unnecessarily detailed, including facial features, expressions and lines of dialouge during particular scenes. The English is also of a below-average level. I edited the plot into something more presentable and moved the cast list to the bottom but user 203.11.134.217 reverted it. To avoid an edit war, can an admin please put his foot down and settle the matter? AceWhatever (talk) 06:45, 17 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I'm not an admin, but your actions are a step in the right direction, and certainly should not have been reverted without some sort of explanation in the the edit summary or here. I've reverted back to your version, and I'd advise a look at the style guidelines for further advice on how to improve the article. Good luck! Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 19:56, 18 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Much thanks for you assistance. I can't contribute more to the article since I haven't watched the movie. But I think we need to plan a contingency in case he/she reverts the changes. Whoever this person is they seem to be awfully one-track minded about the matter.AceWhatever (talk) 20:14, 18 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Wow! I realised there's many of the same two person editting this page. I just read the older version. The writer's command of english wasn't that good but I find the plot he or she wrote was pretty detail and accurate to the show. I just repost it back. Maybe someone can redit it with better command of english with lesser grammical errors? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.117.130.2 (talk) 13:27, 9 July 2008 (UTC)


 * This isn't just a matter of bad grammar. There are far too many details that are unnecessary. This is a plot summary, not a scene-by-scene transcript. Plus the person doing the reverts is giving no justifications for his actions and went as far as to blank the talk page discussion. Unless you can provide a good reason for the presence of the superfluous text, they stay out. Also, please stop reverting to the older version because it removes the constructive additions to the infobox. AceWhatever (talk) 13:19, 10 July 2008 (UTC)