Talk:Skill set

.

Quo vadis
Firstly thanks to the diligent editors who questioned this stub articles raison d'être- I have posted this list on the deletion discussion page. Here are a few positive suggestions of a future structure : Now we need to categorise- Category:Human resource management seems a good place to start, and with in that there are three relevant subcategories. If I do get involved further these are directions I would intend to go.
 * Make a lead and make an article
 * Look to a section
 * Definition
 * History
 * Regional differencies
 * Skill set within Wikipedia
 * Skill set of a newbie
 * Skill set of a established editor
 * Skill set of wikipedia specialists
 * Administrators
 * Project coordinators
 * Copy editors
 * Paid wikimedia employees
 * Arbcom
 * Skill sets within sectors
 * Manual labourer
 * Artisans
 * Graduates
 * Postgraduates
 * Postdoctorals
 * Diplomats
 * Civil servants
 * Politicians
 * Conflicts arising from differing skill sets
 * Economic and political implications
 * Conflicts arising from differing skill sets

I too share the concern that this article could become all-embracing and massive. So I advise that each section have a lead sentence, and a self-contained body so that will be easy to float off sub-articles in future. ClemRutter (talk) 21:53, 8 January 2017 (UTC)


 * I have posted comments on User talk:Kim Dent-Brown. I am a little confused at the redirection. ClemRutter (talk) 17:58, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I plan to make a further expansion of the article now, as envisaged by the close. More anon. Andrew D. (talk) 19:04, 13 January 2017 (UTC)