Talk:Skip (audio playback)

2007-02-9 Automated pywikipediabot message
--CopyToWiktionaryBot 07:19, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of the . Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

PAGE MOVED per discussion below. -GTBacchus(talk) 20:28, 30 October 2007 (UTC) Skip (in record player) → Skip (in CD player) — article almost entirely refers to CD sense and only once mentions record sense —Rapido 14:43, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Survey

 * Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with  or  , then sign your comment with  . Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.


 * Oppose expand the article instead. 132.205.99.122 20:03, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose and suggest Skip (audio) or Skip (audio recording) to allow the article title to encompass both. Otto4711 21:58, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Added gramophone info to article and support move to Skip (audio recording) as suggested by User:Otto4711. —   AjaxSmack   00:20, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Skip (audio) makes more sense. Crazysuit 00:51, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose. However skip (audio playback) would be my preferred target. Skip (audio) could mean something like the gap in the Watergate tapes.  So skip (audio playback) is less ambiguous.  Clearly skip (audio recording) is a poor choice since the skipping occurs on playback and not in the recording process.  My second choice would be Skip (audio) if we need to go there for consensus. Vegaswikian 19:33, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Discussion

 * Any additional comments:
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the . Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.