Talk:Skunklock

COI
The user who put the COI on this page already asked me directly if I had a connection to a different company owned by the same person. I told him I did not. I am not sure how I can prove that, but I would appreciate it if the tag is removed. It is apparently against the rules to take an interest in a section of related articles that are apparently not covered already in Wikipedia. This article is factual and has a neutral tone. That fits the requirements and rules of Wikipedia. Someone's assumption about my motives for contributing have nothing to do with anything. Show some actual evidence before you add a tag and start removing all my recent edits. D-Clancy (talk) 00:45, 27 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Okay, so let's talk about it. You've created articles about two topics whose only connection is Daniel Idzkowski, an entrepreneur with recent history of spam on Wikipedia. One of the articles was a recreation after a relatively fresh deletion discussion (Peekshare) which used questionable sources. This article is for a currently active crowdfunding campaign. Do you see why this is a cause for serious concern? Grayfell (talk) 01:18, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

I believe your concerns were already answered. If my word isn't enough, then fine, case closed. To me, it's very rare to find a topic that is completely unrepresented on Wikipedia. I assumed I could take the opportunity to create brand new articles on topics that naturally came up during my research. If that's not the case, then fine. D-Clancy (talk) 03:59, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Formula
SkunkLock's terms and conditions has some details about the formula used in their locks. It contains capsaicin and butyric acid. Would be better to name them in the article than just vaguely referring them as "chemicals". - 91.147.218.140 (talk) 18:09, 12 March 2021 (UTC)