Talk:Sky Skipper/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: DasallmächtigeJ (talk · contribs) 11:32, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

1. Is it well-written?
In short, yes. The layout seems perfectly fine, so does grammar/spelling. Would lose the "mysteriously" in the preservation section though.

2. Is it verifiable with no original research?
Yes, the article is meticulously sourced. All sources are reliable.

3. Is it broad in its coverage?
'Yes.. It covers everything from development, gameplay, to the release and preservation efforts.

4. Is it neutral?
Yes.

5. Is it stable?
Yes. Absolutely nothing is going to change here.

6. Is it illustrated?
Yes, sufficiently.

Conclusion
After examining the article, I conclude that it qualifies for an immediate pass.--DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 11:32, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I also have no idea why it wasn't copied here in the first place but now it seems to be settled.--DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 15:40, 9 February 2019 (UTC)