Talk:Skylon (spacecraft)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 01:25, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: Two found and fixed. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:29, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Linkrot: None found. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:30, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Once operative, Skylon could potentially lower satellite costs from the current £15,000/kg to £650/kg, according to the UK parliament. This is not strictly speaking true, should read "according to evidence supplied to the UK parliament by Reaction Engines Limited" I have changed this.
 * Otherwise well written, according sufficiently with the MoS.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * References check out, sources are RS, no evidence of OR.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Sufficient detail, without unnecessary trivia.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Tagged, captioned and licensed.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I am happy that this meets the the good article criteria, so I am happy to list it. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 01:47, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I am happy that this meets the the good article criteria, so I am happy to list it. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 01:47, 8 March 2011 (UTC)