Talk:Slavery in Massachusetts

Untitled
From the External_links policy:


 * Wikipedia articles can include links to Web pages outside Wikipedia. Such pages could contain further research that is accurate and on-topic; information that could not be added to the article for reasons such as copyright or amount of detail (such as professional athlete statistics, movie or television credits, interview transcripts, or online textbooks); or other meaningful, relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article for reasons unrelated to their reliability (such as reviews and interviews).
 * Some external links are welcome [such as]....


 * Sites that contain neutral and accurate material that cannot be integrated into the Wikipedia article due to copyright issues, amount of detail (such as professional athlete statistics, movie or television credits, interview transcripts, or online textbooks) or other reasons.
 * Sites with other meaningful, relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article, such as reviews and interviews.
 * For albums, movies, books, and other creative works, links to professional reviews.
 * For albums, movies, books, and other creative works, links to professional reviews.

The links User:Requestion has been removing fit this category and do not fit the "Links normally to be avoided" category at all. For instance, Requestion has been removing from this page a link to Editorial Savoir Faire: Thoreau Transforms His Journal into “Slavery in Massachusetts”, a scholarly article describing in detail how Thoreau transformed the content of his journal into the essay that is the topic of this page. This cannot be justified under any of the guidelines on the Wikipedia External Links policy page. -Moorlock 00:11, 26 June 2007 (UTC)


 * I agree. However, this article should not contain such large extracts of text from the essay/lecture; it should be an encyclopedia article about the essay. -- Rbellin|Talk 15:28, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

I (Alan Kay) think that Wikipedia is currently at its best when quoting original material. How wonderful to be able to find it so simply! In contrast, a distressingly large number of the articles that are about something I know about, especially from direct experience or expert practice, are full of various kinds of errors. So I would like to plead both for more direct material, and for more careful vetting of claims and authors of commentary.