Talk:Small Victories/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Looks good, with only a few minor issues: Otherwise, everything is looking WP:GOOD. I'll put this one on hold - it should be fairly easy to fix/answer these little issues, so good luck! — 97198 (talk) 11:16, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Not a big deal by any means, but it was my understanding that "season" isn't a proper noun (thus "season 4"/3 uncapitalised) - it's not mentioned at WP:MOSTV but see article titles such as Lost (season 4) or Smallville (season 1). I think a few season pages were moved a while ago in accordance with this... but, as I said, not a big deal either way.
 * Should the actors' names be integrated through the plot, do you think? Certainly makes it easier when reading down the article when actors are referred to and readers are expected to know who's who! ;)
 * the major CGI (Computer-generated imagery) moments - maybe "Computer-generated imagery (CGI)"?
 * the few big-VisFX-budget episodes - any reason why this doesn't just spell out "visual effects"?
 * What was the outcome of the Emmy nomination?
 * One anecdotal blooper moment ... is how during the filming of a Thor scene, the puppeteers raised Thor's hand to touch Taping's behind - "Tapping", double P? And is "how" the right word here? Seems kind of badly worded; maybe play around with that one. Also, does this belong under reception rather than production?


 * I have addressed your comments. I may not have been able to satisfy your last point, but then again I could never make that sentence work anywhere before. (I'd be reluctant to lose it though.) – sgeureka t•c 23:22, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Awesome, everything (including that sentence) looks good - I'll go and make it official. :) — 97198 (talk) 07:58, 23 October 2008 (UTC)