Talk:Smalltail shark/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jim Sweeney (talk · contribs) 08:09, 5 December 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Comments

 * First of all can I say that I have never heard of the Smalltail shark, so its interesting to read for that fact alone.


 * No disamb links no action required
 * External links checked no action required
 * In the lead 2–9 young should be two to nine
 * Done.
 * Same in the Biology and ecology section litters of 2–9 (typically 4–6) young
 * Done.
 * The ISBN for Castro, J.H. (2011). The Sharks of North America needs fixing
 * Done.


 * Well done some small points to fix or discuss. I have put a seven day hold on the review to enable users to address any points. Jim Sweeney (talk) 09:03, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Let me know of further issues. -- Yzx (talk) 20:37, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review. -- Yzx (talk) 22:48, 5 December 2011 (UTC)