Talk:Smart Living Lab

Best sources that establish notability
As proposed by @Kvng, I try to list here the best secondary sources:


 * 1) "Votations cantonales - Les Fribourgeois acceptent un soutien de 25 millions à Bluefactory". Le Matin (in French). 2021-06-13. ISSN 1018-3736. Retrieved 2022-06-20.
 * 2) "Un laboratoire fribourgeois se dédie à l'habitat du futur". Le Temps (in French). 2016-10-08. ISSN 1423-3967. Retrieved 2021-09-08.
 * 3) "Le Smart Living Lab avance à Fribourg". Bilan (in French). Retrieved 2021-09-08
 * 4) "Solar Decathlon: Scores and Standings". www.solardecathlon.gov. Retrieved 2021-09-17.
 * 5) "This Swiss bridge proves it's possible to reuse concrete". Popular Science. 2021-10-18. Retrieved 2022-01-27.
 * 6) "Building out of concrete, but without pouring concrete". Innovation Origins. Retrieved 2022-01-27.

Thanks @Kvng! Best, Quaenuncabibis (talk) 07:10, 20 June 2022 (UTC)


 * it looks like 1, 2 and 3 contain the required significant coverage of the lab. ~Kvng (talk) 15:11, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

COI
The creator of this article,, has declared that they've done paid editing for EPFL and Smart Living Lab is closely associated with EPFL so I assume there is a COI here. Please let us know if this is somehow not the case. ~Kvng (talk) 15:19, 20 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi @Kvng, this indeed the case as stated by the COI tag above. Thanks again and best, Quaenuncabibis (talk) 08:02, 21 June 2022 (UTC)