Talk:Smashburger/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: TenPoundHammer (talk · contribs) 23:22, 6 March 2018 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

This is a very well written article all around. I'm fascinated by retail and fast food history, and I found this article highly informative and well-presented.
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * I did a couple minor fixes to remove some grammar and formatting errors.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * Very extensively sourced. I saw no citation errors or unreliable sources at all.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * I feel that the article gives a very thorough description of the chain's history, especially given how new a chain it is overall.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I could see this being a potential FA one day. Again, very well written article all around.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I could see this being a potential FA one day. Again, very well written article all around.