Talk:Smith's red rock hare/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 04:03, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

GA criteria
: With a few very minor tweaks, the article's grammar is correct, and together with its layout is compliant with MOS policies. While you&#39;re doing that... (talk) 23:29, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

: The article uses a fairly-sized number of reputable third-party sources in proportion to its length. Each source appears to have been made full use of, and there does not seem to be any original research. While you&#39;re doing that... (talk) 23:28, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)
 * (c)

: The article provides decent, informative coverage on all areas of the topic for which one would expect encyclopedic information. While you&#39;re doing that... (talk) 23:26, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

. The article maintains a neutral tone, from start to finish. While you&#39;re doing that... (talk) 23:25, 1 October 2017 (UTC) . Looking back as far as a month ago, in the revision history, the article does not appear to have suffered from edit warring or other disruptive behaviour from its contributors in that time. While you&#39;re doing that... (talk) 23:10, 1 October 2017 (UTC) : While the future addition of illustrative image/s of this species will further improve the article as is, what's most important at the moment is that the one image that is used in the article at this time is freely licensed, and serves a relevant purpose when used in this article; that being to provide a visual aide in identifying the species' habitat range. While you&#39;re doing that... (talk) 23:08, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

The article meets the GA criteria, and is passed. While you&#39;re doing that... (talk) 23:30, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Wilhelmina Will Thanks a lot for your review! :D Adityavagarwal (talk) 02:35, 2 October 2017 (UTC)