Talk:Smith & Wesson Model 317 kit gun

Removal of lines regarding it being "ideal for self-defense for inexperienced shooters"
I just removed the parts about the revolver being ideal for self defense for unexperienced shooters. It already had a lot of "citation needed" strewn around. The argument against this is rather simple: The cartridge used is very weak, which requires a lot of skill at shot placement. The trigger is a simple double action revolver trigger, which makes exactly this really, really hard. Meaning this is actually an expert gun that calls for daily training. The advantages for self defense are that is is somewhat low-recoil (though not as good as either a full size gun or a semi-auto) and much more hearing-safe than anything in a bigger caliber.

Since arguments from authority are required in WP, I'll refer to Greg Ellifritz: "How many of you shoot your guns every day? The .22 may not be the best “manstopper”, but with dedication like Henry’s it can certainly be a very effective tool." http://www.activeresponsetraining.net/real-world-22s-for-self-defense — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.79.138.178 (talk) 09:10, 27 July 2016 (UTC)