Talk:Smith and Pepper

Merge
It was proposed that the article be merged to Museum of the Jewellery Quarter. I oppose the merger since the company sounds notable in its own right and so should be a separate article. The museum article should link here and perhaps some of the material from this article moved there, but remaining as separate articles. RJFJR (talk) 16:30, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

I also think they are better off remaining separate. The museum has given Smith & Pepper some retroactive publicity (demonstrating their notability), but it's not a museum of that firm so much as using that form's premises for illustrative purposes. The link for discussing points to that talkpage rather than this one, so I'll make a link there to this item. Yngvadottir (talk) 16:56, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 one external links on Smith and Pepper. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081225132128/http://www.bmag.org.uk:80/index.php?type=element&maincat=1&subcat=2&subelement=3 to http://www.bmag.org.uk/index.php?type=element&maincat=1&subcat=2&subelement=3
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081218015744/http://www.bmag.org.uk:80/index.php?type=expand&maincat=1&subcat=1 to http://www.bmag.org.uk/index.php?type=expand&maincat=1&subcat=1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 12:12, 26 January 2016 (UTC)