Talk:Smokers v Non-Smokers/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Cliftonian (talk · contribs) 11:38, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Oh, this does look like fun. I'll review this shortly. —Cliftonian (talk) 11:38, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria From first glance this looks pretty solid, and quite entertaining to boot. I'll make notes as I go through.
 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose is clear and concise, without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
 * I have copy-edited here and there but nothing major. Generally looks very good.
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * All very well done.
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * No issues.
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * Very good. I tweaked one of the captions a little bit.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * A comfortable GA for sure. A fine article, an interesting bit of cricketing history and a great little read—very well done indeed. —Cliftonian (talk) 12:12, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * Very good. I tweaked one of the captions a little bit.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * A comfortable GA for sure. A fine article, an interesting bit of cricketing history and a great little read—very well done indeed. —Cliftonian <b style="color:white; background:darkgreen">(talk)</b></b> 12:12, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
 * A comfortable GA for sure. A fine article, an interesting bit of cricketing history and a great little read—very well done indeed. <b style="color:white; background:darkgreen">—<b style="color:white; background:darkgreen">Cliftonian</b> <b style="color:white; background:darkgreen">(talk)</b></b> 12:12, 12 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Bonus comments, for further improvement beyond GA:
 * Is it recorded what inspired Walker to choose Smokers and Non-Smokers as the theme for the first game?
 * Did the team selection in each game actually reflect who did and didn't smoke?
 * Is it recorded who ultimately got the ball from the second game?


 * Well done again. <b style="color:white; background:darkgreen">—<b style="color:white; background:darkgreen">Cliftonian</b> <b style="color:white; background:darkgreen">(talk)</b></b> 12:24, 12 September 2013 (UTC)