Talk:Smoking in association football/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Tayi Arajakate (talk · contribs) 05:47, 22 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello C of E, I'll be taking up the review for this article which I will present it to you shortly. I hope you will find my feedback to be useful. Tayi Arajakate  Talk 05:47, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , I've completed the review and listed issues in the comments and assessment sections below. It is a well written article and was an interesting read, has near no issues other than that it needs considerable expansion. If you need time for that, I can put it on hold but I'll give 7 days before I either pass or fail it.  Tayi Arajakate  Talk 18:22, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Comments

 * The bolded portion in the lead should not have wikilinks in them.
 * I could not locate any other issues in the article so its good regarding everything else but I have one big concern which needs to be addressed. It appears mostly centered around the UK and Italy, with a couple minor mentions for other countries which should be expanded on; e.g., Germany, France, etc. Not to mention, there are a lot more countries were football is a major part of the sporting culture which find no mention in the article; e.g. Spain, Netherlands, most South American countries, etc.

Assessment
 Comprehension: The comprehension is good.

Verifiability: The article is verifiable.

Comprehensiveness: The article is adequately comprehensive.

Neutrality: The article is neutral.

Stability: The article is stable. Illustration: The article is well illustrated.


 * I have added some more worldwide content, how is this?  The C of E God Save the Queen!  ( talk ) 06:37, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , the coverage is better than before but I still think its lacking a lot, especially with respect to South America. Tayi Arajakate  Talk 13:12, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I've just added some more for Argentina, Brazil and Paraguay.  The C of E God Save the Queen!  ( talk ) 08:43, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , alright. I have checked them and I still think it can be expanded a lot more but the overall coverage might be about enough for the good article criteria. Since there are no other issues with the article, I'll promote it. Good work on it in general! Tayi Arajakate  Talk 14:17, 28 July 2021 (UTC)