Talk:Snap, Crackle and Pop

Propose to add disambiguation line at the top for the physics aspect
I think it would improve clarity to add an initial "disambiguation line" for the physics aspect of the topic compared to just having an "Physics" heading on a page that apparently in all other respects is just about the cartoon mascots. At first look I dismissed the page having any physics-related content because of this appearance and lack of the familiar disambiguation line. I later found the section of the page through a link from the Jounce page.

Even if the Physics part would remain hosted on this page a disambiguation line could still be introduced to link directly to it. --Xkr47 (talk) 08:25, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

I think that's a great idea. Please add it! --Neil Schoolman (talk) 01:12, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

So I did, but apparently User:Georgia guy thought it was strange and removed it.. Will split the physics section to its own page then.. --Xkr47 (talk) 07:40, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

The physics aspect should be mentioned on this page even if it has its own page. I restored the section. --Neil Schoolman (talk) 09:49, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Can you please elaborate why it should be on this page? I added a disambiguation link, just like other pages that share a name for different subjects, so it was in my opinion clearly still part of the page. Are there more ways to do this than the two I tried so far? I really feel the least accesible version is now back in effect. Wishing for more feedback from Georgia guy and Neil Schoolman.. --Xkr47 (talk) 21:17, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Missing citation
Anyone know where to find the last source? It is dead: 'Visser p. 4' doesn't lead to anything. I tried to Google it to no avail. --Scientificaldan (talk) 21:51, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

Furthermore, the first source is also missing. Astrotyro (talk) 17:55, 14 January 2020 (UTC)