Talk:Snappy Gifts

Untitled
1) Article is sufficiently sourced from multiple sources. 2) The subject is a multi-million dollar international company which serves over 200 global enterprises (and counting). I believe that notability has already been proven beyond a reasonable doubt. --Omer Toledano (talk) 04:02, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Notability
Hello. Thanks and regards, Biwom (talk) 06:38, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Can you check if this is a re-creation of Snappy app? The sources do not really support "Snappy Gifts" as the article name.
 * It is clear for me the sources in English are insufficient to establish this company's notability. I think you should start an AfD so that other users can check the sources in Hebrew.
 * Is prnewswire.com really what you want to build a consensus upon?
 * Is prnewswire.com really what you want to build a consensus upon?
 * Is prnewswire.com really what you want to build a consensus upon?


 * I disagree. There is a substantial amount of secondary sources directly dealing with the subject beyond "mere mention", as you claim. --Omer Toledano (talk) 06:48, 4 July 2019 (UTC)


 * As for recreation, the earlier article was on the same subject, but it was a much simpler very short straight advertisement. This is more than a G6-eligible re-creation and needs to be decided on its own merits.  DGG ( talk ) 17:16, 4 July 2019 (UTC)