Talk:Snoqualmie Indian Tribe

Move?

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:40, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Snoqualmie (tribe) → Snoqualmie —
 * The tribe is the primary subject; all other places and entities with this name that have WP articles are named after the tribe. I have just moved the dab from Snoqualmie to Snoqualmie (disambiguation) &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 18:42, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose Stats for Snoqualmie, Washington 2379 views, Snoqualmie (tribe) 375 views, the tribe can't be regarded as the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Tassedethe (talk) 18:51, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose per Tassedethe; primary topics are not established by which came first, but by, among other things, which article people are most searching for. Parsecboy (talk) 16:41, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Vandalism
I just removed this phrase from the law enforcement section: "In 2009, there was a series of cougar attacks in the Snoqualmie area which made national headlines and prompted the Snoqualmie Tribe Police Services to ban admission to all women over the age of 45." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.107.0.74 (talk) 17:08, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Outdated Section - Law Enforcement
Hello. I don't have the time atm to update the page, but the Law Enforcement section is very outdated. Snoqualmie Casino has several tribal police officers, as well as community safety officers. I do no have citable sources for that at the moment, but the obsolete information should at least be deleted, or a note that it's outdated made.

On a related subject, is it a normal part of a tribal Wikipedia article to discuss something like law enforcement? It seems very nitch and not very important nor notable. But I'm unsure if this is standard procedure, so I'm leaving the section for now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.245.150.241 (talk) 04:20, 21 February 2020 (UTC)