Talk:So Close (Enchanted song)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Cartoon network freak (talk · contribs) 12:38, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Lead

 * Link "Disney"
 * Done.--Changedforbetter (talk) 14:17, 18 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The lead is really well-written, nothing else I can complain about
 * Thanks a lot!!--Changedforbetter (talk) 14:17, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Infobox

 * The "Recorded" parametre is not cited throughout the article's body
 * Can't find a source for this; removed.--Changedforbetter (talk) 14:17, 18 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The "Genre" parametre doesn't need to be extra cited here as it's already in the article's body
 * Removed citation.--Changedforbetter (talk) 14:17, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Writing and recording

 * that this appears to be Giselle and Robert's final moment together → here, you kind of come out of the sudden with these names, and this may be confusing to people who hadn't read the lead before. I suggest something like: "that this appears to be Giselle and Robert's—the main characters in Enchanted (2007), the fantasy film "So Close" is featured on—final moment together"
 * I've revised the sentence to be more expository.--Changedforbetter (talk) 14:17, 18 April 2019 (UTC)


 * enjoyed but ultimately preferred the final version used in the film → enjoyed but ultimately rejected in favor of the final version used in the film
 * Sounds good. Replaced.--Changedforbetter (talk) 14:17, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Context

 * I have never seen a "Context" section before in any of the GANs I've reviewed in the past years, but this seems so genuine here, so go for it
 * Thank you! I think it helps with songs that originate within the narrative of a film.--Changedforbetter (talk) 14:17, 18 April 2019 (UTC)


 * and Nancy (Idina Menzel), his fiancé → and his fiancé Nancy (Idina Menzel) (to be more precise)
 * Revised.--Changedforbetter (talk) 14:17, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Composition

 * three minutes and forty-nine seconds (3:49). → the bit in brackets in unnecessary
 * I've seen it used in other song articles, but I've removed it.--Changedforbetter (talk) 14:17, 18 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Link "waltz"
 * Done.--Changedforbetter (talk) 14:17, 18 April 2019 (UTC)


 * describing the track as "A more contemporary → describing the track as "a more contemporary
 * Fixed.--Changedforbetter (talk) 14:17, 18 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Link "d-flat"
 * Done.--Changedforbetter (talk) 14:17, 18 April 2019 (UTC)


 * beginning "You're in my arms → beginning with "You're in my arms
 * Done.--Changedforbetter (talk) 14:17, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Reception

 * writing "musical nitpickers → writing that "musical nitpickers
 * Done.--Changedforbetter (talk) 14:17, 18 April 2019 (UTC)


 * For more flow: Jared Johnson, writing for The Sojourn, described → Jared Johnson, writing for The Sojourn, conversely described
 * Done.--Changedforbetter (talk) 14:17, 18 April 2019 (UTC)


 * McLaughlin's most streamed song on Spotify.[33] As of January 2019, the song had been streamed on Spotify more than 16 million times → McLaughlin's most streamed song on Spotify,[33] with more than 16 million streams as of January 2019
 * Done.--Changedforbetter (talk) 14:17, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Live perfromances and covers

 * McLaughlin revealed that he was very nervous during the performance: "more nervous than I have ever been in my entire life." → this is kind of unnecessary; aren't all singers nervous prior to big performances? I suggest you remove this
 * Removed.--Changedforbetter (talk) 14:17, 18 April 2019 (UTC)


 * "eponymous" is a more encyclopedic term for "self-titled"
 * Done.--Changedforbetter (talk) 14:17, 18 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Both singers' parents listened to the cover shortly after they recorded it and enjoyed it → This is also very redundant as their parents are not any sort of music critics
 * Removed.--Changedforbetter (talk) 14:17, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Other things

 * 33.3% is (still) a good copyviolation percentage
 * No disambiguation links
 * No dead links
 * As far as I checked them, the references do support the assertions made in this article
 * Sweet!--Changedforbetter (talk) 14:17, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Outcome

 * for 7 days — A very well-written article. Just a few changes and I'll be ready to pass this for GA. Greets; Cartoon network freak (talk) 12:19, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much! I think I've addressed everything. Looking forward to your final verdict and comments .--Changedforbetter (talk) 14:17, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Passing — Really great work that is deserving of GA status. Congrats! Is there any chance you could also review one of my GANs? Just disregard if you're too busy... Greets; Cartoon network freak (talk) 14:23, 18 April 2019 (UTC)