Talk:So Happy I Could Die/GA2

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

I've noticed this was listed as a GA a while back, but have concerns after looking it over. The track seems rather limited in coverage, particularly its "live performances section" and information on commercial performance. Musicnotes (ref#6) is dead and therefore fails WP:V. Also, Toronto Sun (ref#15) is not a reliable source. Its lead and reception do not even mention its Dance/Electronic Digital Songs chartings, therefore WP:LEAD is not met. Per MOS:QUOTEMARKS, "it’s" should be "it's". I also question the use of "is drenched with Auto-Tune", perhaps "is heavily Auto-Tuned" would've been better. My biggest concern, however, is that this track fails WP:NSONGS for very little third-party coverage independent of The Fame Monster reviews. I did manage to find sources such as Capitol, AzCentral, NME, and SF Weekly that are not album reviews and mention the song, but they only talk about the song briefly. They do not give much detail on its content or anything. With this being said, I am boldly delisting this article and redirecting it back to The Fame Monster. SNUGGUMS (talk · contribs) 00:05, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Being WP:BOLD does not mean you would not follow the process of WP:GAR in any way. I have reverted all your edits for redirecting. You have been asked time and again not to redirect articles with such reasoning. After GAR, AFD is the way to go and you know this after the numerous attempts of AFDing the Katy Perry song articles. So please do not do this again. This was a very very bad faith move. And seriously, delisting for such trivial issues? — Indian: BIO  · [ ChitChat ] 04:39, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
 * While the MOS bits were minor, a track not meeting notability criteria automatically prevents it from becoming GA. The talk page at WP:GAN discussed this past June emphasizing notability during nominations, and concluded that it being notable was an implicit requirement. I will set up an AfD or proposed merge for future instances where articles are listed as GA when they actually don't meet inclusion critiera. SNUGGUMS (talk · contribs) 04:53, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Its chart listing in multiple charts automatically trumps up its notability, but go for AFD anyways, which is what you should have done before all this hassle. You are my friend SNUGGUMS, but sometimes I wonder why don't you follow the community way? :( — Indian: BIO  · [ ChitChat ] 04:58, 2 August 2014 (UTC)