Talk:So Much (for) Stardust

Title of Page
Should the title not just be "So Much (For) Stardust, given its a double entendre? 2600:1700:9730:4BC0:7CD6:AA87:6459:5549 (talk) 03:18, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
 * You are right, and I have reverted the page move. If the double entendre were merely denoted through an all-caps part of a title, I would fully agree it's a stylisation, but I don't believe a parenthesised part of a title is a stylisation. With this logic, songs that have a parenthesised part at the beginning (e.g. "(You're So Square) Baby I Don't Care") or end (e.g. "Do You Know (What It Takes)") are also "stylisations". Having the page at So Much for Stardust forces one meaning when I think it's pretty clear it's intended to be read both as a "hopeful"(?) or "doubtful" statement, "So Much Stardust", and "So Much for Stardust", hence why the one portion is parenthesised.  Ss  112   05:02, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Agreed. I'm usually against editors excessive denotations of stylizations, but this is one of those times where it's important to retain because it alters the meaning. Sergecross73   msg me  14:42, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Source

 * https://www.nme.com/news/music/fall-out-boy-patrick-stump-interview-so-much-for-stardusy-joe-trohman-love-from-the-other-side-lyrics-meaning-3384299 Sergecross73   msg me  14:42, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 24 March 2023
Hold Me Like a Grudge was not a single. It should be removed from the singles list. Robertbullin (talk) 13:11, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
 * ❌ Rolling Stone appears to call it a single, at least. If there's a counterpoint, it'd be best to hold further discussion until there is a consensus on it. Sergecross73   msg me  13:26, 24 March 2023 (UTC)