Talk:So Yesterday (novel)

Pokemon
The part about the pokemon episode that "caused seizures in over 600" children is untrue. Nowhere near that many children experienced seizures from that incident. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.194.10.13 (talk) 18:30, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Quoted from the "Denno Senshi Porygon" page-"Japan's Fire Defense Agency reported that a total of 685 viewers, 310 boys and 375 girls, were taken to hospitals by ambulances." -Minako-chan27 (talk) 03:32, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Bwaaaa!!
This article makes no sense. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.74.210.5 (talk) 20:33, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I found it absolute rubbish, too. I wish it were more coherent. If it weren't so incoherent and messed-up, I might want to read the book more. Lunakeet 17:20, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
 * That’s was nice of you to say that but I don’t think you should be able to do that because you have to be there for your own family 2600:1004:B01A:5DC6:3969:73F5:4706:D2F9 (talk) 14:35, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

its all good
It's a good book i randomley checked it out of my libary and liked it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.118.200.113 (talk) 23:59, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Fahrenheit 9/11 or 451?
"...and has been optioned to be made into a film by one of the producers of Fahrenheit 451 and Bowling for Columbine"

^ This line has to be referring to Fahrenheit 9/11, and not a film version of the Ray Bradbury novel, right? I tried looking through the cited source: [citation 6] and found nothing specific about by whom a film version is being produced or optioned to be produced, so I didn't change the line right-out.