Talk:Social framework analysis

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:38, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Help-me request
I come in here as an ICT-engineer working in a project in the multi-disciplinary field of cognitive sciences, more specifically on "accelerated memorization", accelerated reading and "accelerated learning", where I work on "accelerated learning software apps and tools" and where we are confronted with the fact that what we deem to know and see is actually a mental construct filled with gaps. Let me illustrate: you claim to know what is a "duck" - you have seen it multiple times. Ok, so then draw me one? Those of us who are not art-painters, won't get further than - what even artists who drew ducks in hieroglyphs in ancient Egypt would find embarrassing or even at the time of humans living and drawing in caves! Or another classical - you claim you have noticed and paid attention your wife when she came in yet 2 minutes laters she's on the phone with her girlfriends pointing out that you didn't notice a. her new hair style from her visit to the hairdresser b. nor did you notice her new shoes. Also in court, it is for this very phenomenon that lawyer and judges verify what a witness actually saw and heard versus what the witness's mind constructed. It is amazing how much our brain "constructs" from the sensory input bits it receives from our senses: visual, hearing, smelling etc and the memories stored in our brain and from which we "construct" "a reality". It is in this context that I use the term or word combination "logical framework", because that's a term that I thought I had heard being used around me. For the project I need to document what I'm doing, what the accelerated learning app is doing, what it is based upon and so I need and wanted to link to an wikipedia article on logical framework - but it doesn't exist. That lead me to the conclusion that maybe "logical framework" is not a correct term. So I start searching the wikipedia on the use of framework in the context of sociology and that's how I stumble into this article on Social framework analysis, to discover there is no article on social framework, nor the use of framework in a sociological context, and to top it off, there is only a "Framework disambiguation page" - just click "framework" to get ot it, with +50 terms that have the word "Framework" in them, of which a large number have a sociological context!? So now I start wondering if the term that I use "logical framework" actually exists and should actually be "sociological framework", hence my request: "Can anybody write an article about "Social framework" and "Logical framework" as I assume that a sociological framework doesn't have to be as logical in the way that we ICT people need and use the word logical - because if you are not concistent and logical in programming - your program just dont' work at all and your computer generates a nice stubborn "error" :) ? Thy SvenAERTS (talk) 08:10, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
 * That's a whole of a lot of text for a simple question. So in answer, social framework is an article, hence it not being a redlink. Remember that article titles are case-sensitive. Additionally, if you wish to request for an article to be written, you can do so at WP:RA, else you're free to try create it yourself. Does that sum up everything you had? — IVORK Talk 09:15, 14 November 2019 (UTC)