Talk:Social inertia/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: DASonnenfeld (talk · contribs) 11:29, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Following are my perspectives on this article in relation to Wikipedia's Good Article criteria:


 * 1) Well written - the article is reasonably well written; it could be developed further
 * 2) Verifiable - the editors/authors have done an above average job in referencing material in the article; some room for improvement here, though
 * 3) Broad in coverage - certainly broad in coverage
 * 4) Neutral - for all of its breadth, though, in its present form the article presents only one 'side' on this topic; a reader gets no sense of discussion, debate, critical or opposing viewpoints
 * 5) Stable - since further development is needed, in my view, I would suggest that it is not yet stable
 * 6) Illustrated - no images, figures or diagrams currently are utilized in the article

I believe that 'class=start' is an appropriate evaluation of this article's quality in its current state.


 * Have you finished the GA review? If so, you need to close it. Instructions are available on Good article nominations/Instructions. Feel free to ask me for help if you need assistance. Edge3 (talk) 03:47, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅, thanks. Kind regards, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 03:56, 11 December 2013 (UTC)