Talk:Socialist Party of Bangladesh

Removing text
The edits being made by User:বি. অনিত্য অনিরুদ্ধ violate WP:NPOV and WP:COPYVIO. Wikipedia is not a soapbox for the Socialist Party of Bangladesh. This is an encyclopaedia. articles must be neutral, and not promote the party's point of view. Ground Zero | t 16:46, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

I am User:বি. অনিত্য অনিরুদ্ধ , see all parties wiki from these category, Communist parties in Bangladesh, Communism in Bangladesh, Political parties in Bangladesh, Bangladesh.

what's my wrong!! also see: Communist_Party_of_Bangladesh there: Contents 1 History 1.1 Independent Bangladesh 2 Ideology and organization 3 Strategy and tactics 4 See also 5 External links

SPB Contents 1 Party History 2 Ideology 5 Political Activities 6 On International Issues 7 The International Communist Movement

this contents were wrong!

I have been reverting your edits because they are not neutral in tone, but are written to promote the SPB. Becuase of the many grammatical errors in your talk page comments, I suspect that much of what you are adding to the article is not your own work, but has been copied directly from other sources -- see WP:COPYVIO. Ground Zero | t 22:47, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Merger proposal
I propose to merge Socialist Students' Front (SSF) into Socialist Party of Bangladesh (SPB), of which it is the student wing. There are no independent, reliable, secondary sources containing significant coverage of SSF separate from SPB, so it does not meet the notability guidelines for a stand alone article. What is reliably sourced in the SSF article can easily be explained in the context of parent organization SPB, and the SPB article is of a reasonable size that the merging of SFF will not cause any problems as far as article size is concerned. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:28, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Support Per proposer.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 23:31, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
 * ✅ Klbrain (talk) 08:33, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I note that you've partially reversed the merge (with this edit) (and removed the redirect) without leaving an explanation here or in the Edit summary. Could you let us know why? Klbrain (talk) 20:18, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

I have added some independent, reliable source containing significant coverage of SSF separate from SPB in hopes that it'd get a stand alone article. If it still doesn't meet the requirements then it can be merged back again. I am sorry if I've made any mistakes. I actually have very little idea about wikipedia editing is all. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shovon.ssf (talk • contribs) 22:25, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your productive edits on Socialist Students' Front; with the additional edits it might well be suitable for a stand-alone article. Let's see how things go, leaving them as separate for now. Klbrain (talk) 17:21, 24 July 2021 (UTC)