Talk:Soering v United Kingdom

Assessment
The recent expansion from stub to article was a great step in the direction to formal review for "Good Article". Areas of expansion could be: Opposing arguments of the UK at trial and expansion of the importance/significance section to include references to articles on human rights, death penalty etc. (for instance: petioner's use of the case in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, Supreme Court justice Breyer's opinions etc.). I have initially rated it as "mid" importance, but it may be assessed as "high" or "low" importance depending on alternative viewpoints. Legis Nuntius (talk) 22:24, 6 January 2008 (UTC)