Talk:Sofia the First/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Kaleeb18 (talk · contribs) 01:59, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

I'll be picking this one up. This might be surprising, but when you have little sisters you know a lot about shows like these lol. ― Kaleeb18TalkCaleb 01:59, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

more to come...
 * her widowed mother, Miranda, have – Correct me if I'm wrong but are the commas needed? (All I have done is looked over the lead, plot, and cast. So far looks great!)
 * To my knowledge, yes. Since Sofia only has one widowed mother, it's a, uh, something clause... wait *googles* apposition. (MOS:COMMA kinda explains it.) Pamzeis (talk) 07:12, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Haha and oh yeah! I think if I remember, they are also called something like nonessential and essential clauses. Looks fine to me though! ― Kaleeb18TalkCaleb 13:12, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
 * I must say relating to grammar, spelling, and that sort of stuff the article looks great! The only thing that sort of pops out to me is this All four seasons of Sofia the First can be bought on iTunes and Google Play. They can be streamed on Netflix, while the first season is available on FuboTV. It just seems a little bit promotional to me.
 * Thank you very much (especially considering prose isn't really my strong point)!
 * Rewritten that bit
 * There are no sources for the cast and characters section
 * Per MOS:TVPLOT, such information does not require (a) reference(s) as it can be sourced back to the original work
 * What makes MediaMikes and Epguides.com (seems like past discussions at WP:RSN say its not reliable) reliable?
 * MediaMikes: from their "About" page, the site seems to have paid staff. Mike Gencarelli, the founder of the site and writer of the article in question, has written for Dark Horizons, which was nominated for a Webby Award (considered " The Oscars of the Internet ")
 * Removed epguides
 * There are no copyvios, looking at the Earwig detector
 * Spotchecks for refs 9, 12, 22, 25, 37, 44, and 53 are all good.

Hopefully, all ✅. Pamzeis (talk) 10:29, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Looks good! ― Kaleeb18TalkCaleb 11:47, 20 August 2022 (UTC)