Talk:Soft lithography

Good Article nomination has failed
The Good article nomination for has failed
 * There is no real prose here to review. Both main sections are lists - they should be converted to normal prose.  Also (in the words of Rogers and Nuzzo, p. 50, as cited in "References") is unnecessarily verbose - use the tag to indicate where statements are sourced from.  See Cite.php.

Worldtraveller 21:37, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Ok we need to form a project or at least a taskforce to clean this area up. I will attempt to do so in the next few daysUser:mystic force

This article is a confused mess. It is titled soft lithography, but spends most of its space discussing microcontact printing. In some places, it discusses microcontact printing as something that can be done with soft lithography (true), but in others it seems to be using the term soft lithography to refer to only microcontact printing. 152.20.154.200 (talk) 15:30, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

ODT?
Is ODT octadecanethiol? Moletrouser (talk) 10:35, 25 January 2011 (UTC)