Talk:Sol Levi/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: MayhemMario (talk) 16:02, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: I found zero disambiguations. Well Done!

Linkrot: I found zero dead links. Well Done!

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose) : b (MoS) :
 * One thing, the lead is a bit messy maybe split it into two paragrpahs and maybe add a caption for the picture?
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
 * All references are fine and no original research. Though there is no reception though looking on websites there isnt actually any which I can find either. MayhemMario (talk) 16:02, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Thorough and well focussed
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Maybe this is picky, on the development of Sol you could put a picture of Cole like with Vanessa Gold. MayhemMario (talk) 16:02, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Every thing is good, so I am happy to list this as a Good Article. Congratulations! MayhemMario (talk) 18:01, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Every thing is good, so I am happy to list this as a Good Article. Congratulations! MayhemMario (talk) 18:01, 11 May 2011 (UTC)