Talk:SolarMagic

Do not delete
Don't delete. This page has four third-party, independent references, three of which are linked, and the subject matter is clearly now being referenced and discussed in vertical media. A Wikipedia entry that is factually-based and objective, as I believe this is, is entirely appropriate. Thanks. Naracsuah (talk) 00:22, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Although the page now has only two references, I would agree on keep. --DThomsen8 (talk) 13:10, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

The article has only 2 citations, both are weak, since they're not from peer reviewed journals, so the figures may not have been rigorously scrutinised. This article is basically an advertisement, which is not the function of wikipedia. Brianthegiant (talk) 09:30, 26 June 2011 (UTC)