Talk:Solar Physics (journal)

Requested move 24 September 2014

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: not moved. Number   5  7  11:57, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Solar Physics (journal) → Solar Physics – letter case suffices for disambiguation – Fgnievinski (talk) 04:42, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
 * This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:36, 24 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Oppose Solar physics and Solar Physics could easily be mistaken. This is a (journal) so being labelled as one does no harm and makes article easier to locate in a bunch of search results. In ictu oculi (talk) 10:09, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Oppose Agree with In ictu oculi. --Randykitty (talk) 14:32, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Oppose per above. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 15:00, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Oppose per above.TR 15:54, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Oppose per above. Primefac (talk) 17:49, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Oppose as a different case for one letter does not suffice for disambiguation. Modest Genius talk 22:28, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
 * You guys are wrong according to WP:DIFFCAPS and WP:PRECISE. Fgnievinski (talk) 02:40, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Oppose Agreed that WP:DIFFCAPS is relevant here. The last paragraph there says "this form of disambiguation may not be sufficient if one article is far more likely a primary topic than the other." I think this is the case here--the field of solar physics is much more of a primary topic than the journal. Thus I support Solar Physics being a redirect to Solar physics, and Solar physics having a hatnote pointing to Solar Physics (journal). --Mark viking (talk) 04:07, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 27 June 2021

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: Not moved. (non-admin closure) Adumbrativus (talk) 02:00, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Solar Physics (journal) → Solar Physics – capitalization already offers enough distinction from solar physics. fgnievinski (talk) 00:46, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
 * This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:09, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * queried move request Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:11, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Would respectfully disagree, the capitalized form should go to the Solar physics page, an easy search mistake which isn't actually that much of a mistake. Randy Kryn (talk) 04:05, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Oppose per the other Randy K. :-)
 * Oppose and why was it attempted as a technical request with previous RM? In ictu oculi (talk) 14:27, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Oppose per the above. BD2412  T 00:48, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Oppose per others, just Solar Physics would not be clear enough. SunDawn (talk) 12:28, 30 June 2021 (UTC)