Talk:Solicitor-General (New Zealand)

Inflammatory claims
I do not believe publicwatchdogs is a reliable source. It is obviously a personal site, and appears to be linked to by very few other sites. kiwisfirst is also a personal site with very few incoming links. The two sites link to each other. Most of the other incoming links are from blogs. Both are obviously pushing some ideas about corruption. They are not acceptable as sources for Wikipedia.

TVNZ is a reliable source, but their report does not include the inflammatory wording that has been added to the article. While the request to jail for contempt is described as unprecedented, it appears to be undue weight to deal with this specific case in such a short article.- gadfium 21:11, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes. This clearly demonstrates how Wiki can be manipulated by someone with a politicial axe to grind. Create a juvenile blog, make a wild claim, add the claim to Wiki and use the blog as a reference. Kaiwhakahaere (talk) 00:43, 26 July 2008 (UTC)