Talk:Solid-state storage

Room temperature semiconductor memory cells
Shouldn't we have an article on Room temperature semiconductor memory cell ? It seems a very promosing technology with many advantages (low power consumption, and simplification of amount of different types of memory needed in a pc), see the paper here. See also this article. Genetics4good (talk) 08:19, 17 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Please keep in mind that all new articles are required to pass the Wikipedia's notability requirements. 46.239.15.156 (talk) 07:15, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Dead Links fixed
I finally got around to replacing those dead links I marked a while back. It took me too many edits / undos / redos to do it the proper way but we now have no dead links in the article. Kc7txm (talk) 22:16, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

And I just rewrote and relinked the intro portion of the article so it presents good links to other articles and reads a bit clearer. If I am stepping on anyone's toes feel free to message me and we can collaborate. The closing sentence of the intro was just a really hard read for me grammatically. Kc7txm (talk) 22:30, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Recovery of text messages on phone
I had text messages on my phone now they are gone and I'm trying to recover them 2601:800:8300:1EDD:9C21:363E:3517:1D7B (talk) 22:39, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

on last edit
Wording was less than clear ... misleading if not wrong.

In particular, just because solid-state has no moving parts does not directly result in it being faster than electromechanical (EM). It is a major contributing factor, but not the sole cause. One can say that SSS has no latency due to moving the media, and that moving the media is a major factor is access speed for EM. But surely, SSS has some form of latency that EM does not. Every tech (every process) has latency that is particular to its design. And, moving parts is not the only difference between SSS and EM. Stevebroshar (talk) 12:07, 20 March 2024 (UTC)