Talk:Solomon Islands at the 1988 Summer Olympics/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Bennv3771 (talk · contribs) 12:20, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

I'll do this. This is my first GA review so bear with me if I make any mistakes. Bennv3771 (talk) 12:20, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it well written?
 * A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
 * See below
 * B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
 * 1) Is it verifiable with no original research?
 * A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
 * B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons&mdash;science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
 * C. It contains no original research:
 * D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
 * B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * No images, but given the topic there are probably none readily available.
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Short and sweet article. I'll pass this once the below issues are addressed.
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * No images, but given the topic there are probably none readily available.
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Short and sweet article. I'll pass this once the below issues are addressed.
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Short and sweet article. I'll pass this once the below issues are addressed.

Comments: --Bennv3771 (talk) 13:09, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
 * This was the island nation's second time .... following their debut four years earlier. "four years earlier" is currently a piped link to 1984 Summer Olympics. Given this refers specifically to Solomon Islands' debut, I think readers would be expecting to be directed to Solomon Islands at the 1984 Summer Olympics instead.
 * In his three attempts ... making his final mark for that portion 85 kilograms, and in 24th place.
 * Missing comma after "In his three attempts"
 * "and in 24th place" doesn't sound right to me. Perhaps replace with "which put him in 24th place" or "putting him in 24th place".
 * In his third attempt ... and in 22nd place.
 * Replace "and in 22nd place" as well
 * , changes made, thanks for the review! Courcelles (talk) 14:44, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the quick response. Passed. Bennv3771 (talk) 14:46, 12 August 2018 (UTC)