Talk:Solway Harvester

Edit war over "In Service" field in infobox
Please discuss any changes here before reverting other editor's edits. Dan1980 (talk | stalk) 13:30, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Please see the other editor's talkpage. This was a simple misunderstanding over the use of template field by a new editor.  After bringing this up at his talkpage, and encouraging him to discuss it, I removed the incorrect fields.  Please don't try to escalate the situation by calling it an edit war when it really isn't.  Benea (talk) 15:11, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok, I didn't see that he has since re-added the field. I am choosing not to war over this, because it really is a silly little thing.  In future however please make yourself aware of Don't template the regulars, and rather than jumping the gun with a template, raise your concerns in person if you feel it necessary. Benea (talk) 15:40, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
 * You were both guilty of reverting three times, so it would have been unfair to warn the other user and not you also. OK, I was maybe a bit lazy in using the template rather than writing you a personal message, but if there's an easy way to so something I'll usually choose that option! :-) Dan1980 (talk | stalk) 15:48, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Fair enough I suppose, but perhaps bear it in mind for next time. Incidentally it seems very likely that the other user is in fact a sockpuppet of a banned user, and having got a reaction is now trying to spread a little disruptive editing our way. If he is blocked, reverting it as vandalism seems justifiable.  But at the end of the day it's one small field in an infobox, I don't think I'll lose sleep over it. Benea (talk) 15:57, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
 * He's been blocked for being a sockpuppet, so I've reverted back to your version. Dan1980 (talk | stalk) 23:31, 19 February 2008 (UTC)