Talk:Somebody That I Used to Know/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Cmbcmb999 (talk · contribs) 08:14, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Hi, I am going to start the review of Somebody That I Used To Know. Thanks! Cmbcmb999 (talk) 08:16, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi! Nice -- Hahc21 [ TALK ] [ CONTRIBS  ] 08:28, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

I have thoroughly reviewed the aritcle and have found: The article has reliable sources, it is completely un-biased, it is well-written, it is factually accurate and it is stable. It is now listed as a Good Article.

Thank you Cmbcmb999 (talk) 08:44, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Me and Shaidar cuebiyar put a lot of effort in the article =) Anything to be fixed? or is everything allright? -- Hahc21 [ TALK ] [ CONTRIBS  ] 14:42, 2 June 2012 (UTC)


 * No, I personally don't think anything needs to be fixed.

Not to rain on the parade here, but I find this review a bit suspect. While I am sure that Cmbcmb999 was acting in good faith by reviewing this, s/he has only 48 edits to articlespace out of 139 total—not an experienced editor at all. I don't mean to WP:BITE here, but I'm not convinced that Cmb really knows what "good" content looks like. If this had been a more thorough review, I'd be less inclined to bring this up, but it seems that Cmb gave the article a quick once-over and judged it "good" without a real understanding of the process. This article is a strong candidate, IMO, but it deserves a closer look than was given here. Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 21:58, 14 June 2012 (UTC)